I guess I’ll start off by walking into the brick wall of popular opinion…
For me, what was memorable about this concert wasn’t the music, it was more about that magnificent stage (no pun intended). Being a long-time fan of such engineering marvels as the Gateway Arch and the Hoover Dam, this U2 stage was really something to contemplate… I know I’m going against the tide here… other than Jim DeRogatis at the Chicago Sun-Times who disliked the proceedings for different reasons… the Chicago Tribune, Rolling Stone and most everyone I know are tripping over themselves to emanate the U2 love (brought to you by Blackberry and Live Nation no less). But I’m not hopping on that bandwagon… to me it was a crappy, uninspired set list… it didn’t come close to the proper ebb and flow, soft valleys to soaring crescendos worthy of a stage like that… worthy of a band that has meant as much as U2 has over their lifespan.
So here’s an idea… for all the energy expended in setting up this stage and then taking it back down, that coupled with the majority in attendance having spent $250 for a ticket (a truly obscene number)… Why not play 3+ hours? Buck the trendy 2 hour 15 minute show and blow the crowd away. Many sporting events last 3 hours, good long-form movies do as well, is it too much to ask that a $250 stadium rock show might?
Not to say that “No Line on the Horizon” isn’t made up of decent songs, but they’re brand new… how many have listened to them more than 9 or 10 times? If your going to play 7 of the 11 songs on your 6-month old new album… at least expand your set list so the new songs aren’t played at the expense of the songs that you made your mark with… the songs that could have been used to bring the high parts of the show that much higher… again, worthy of that stage, worthy of the band… I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t thinking about what Pink Floyd might have done with that stage, but I digress…
There’s a reason that “Bullet the Blue Sky” and “New Years Day” have been U2 live staples since they were released. It’s because they’re from that period of the U2 canon when they were still struggling and hungry… which backs up what I’ve always thought… rich guys don’t write great songs… serviceable songs maybe, but great songs no… back in the day they were naming their songs things like “Sunday Bloody Sunday”, “Drowning Man” and “Surrender”. What we’ve gotten in the last decade have been sappy, micro-titled, radio-ready songs like “Beautiful Day”, “Elevation” and now most recently, “Magnificent”.
The boys of U2 are forever fat and happy… The life experiences that made them the band they were are but a mere speck in their rearview mirrors. From here it’s all luxury, limos and leer jets… there will be no more hardship and struggle, everything from here on out will be staged (again, no pun intended). So if that’s the case, open up your discography when you’re deciding on the sequencing of your set list. Don’t put live bullets back in the box just because they’re not on your latest album… I believe that U2 fears becoming the Rolling Stones, a touring greatest hits jukebox… but U2’s catalog is not mostly blues-derivative songs about shagging… rather, they wrote many of the anthems that defined their generation. These are songs that should be front and center, for as long as this band plays live… and if the resulting set list exceeds 3 hours… don’t worry about it Dublin, we’ll stay and listen.
Now on to the stage… on this front the band and their production team have succeeded in every way. Designed by Willie Williams working on his 10th U2 production along with Architect Mark Fisher working on his 6th… their creation, dubbed “the spaceship”, was built by Belgian company Stageco using high-pressure hydraulic systems. The steel structure is 90 feet tall and was designed to support 180 tons. The center pylon, which was my favorite part, reaches 150 feet into the air and is topped with a massive disco ball, a popular U2 motif. The super-structure takes 4 days to build with an additional 12 hours required to set up the main stage and lift the video screen into place.
The cylindrical 360 degree video screen weighs 54 tons and opens up in a scissor-like fashion to resemble an enormous gyro. Fully extended, it covers an area of 14,000 square feet which is as big as 2 doubles tennis courts. The video screen is made up of over 1 million pieces… 500,000 pixels, 320,000 fasteners, 30,000 cables and 150,000 machined pieces. Once the show is over, it takes 6 hours for the production team to dismantle the stage and another 48 hours for the road crew to take down the super-structure and get it loaded onto the trucks. The stage cost $40 million to design and build and that was just for the first one. The band is currently traveling around North America with 3 complete stages tended to by 500 crew members who are using 189 Semi-trucks for its transport.
(Editor’s Note; For the purposes of this review I’m overlooking the obvious conflict of interest here as the band that claims to want to save the world is doing its damnedest here to hasten the end-of-days. Buying carbon-offsets and mandating the crew use canteens over plastic water bottles is not gonna get you off the hook for this one Bono.)
From an engineering standpoint there’s nothing that spectacular going on, the design is perfectly symmetrical. Where it succeeds is in compressing the vastness of the stadium music experience. The scale of the stage is so immense, it stands on an equal footing with the stadium containing it… it has towers and bridges, ramps and runways… all perfectly suited for allowing the band members 360 degrees of mobility… not to mention the truly state of the art sound system, sending out sound in 360 degrees, lending itself to the open-air stadium that will never bounce that sound back where it came from… the songs they did play were crystal clear… on this front, U2 really delivered the goods, it was like nothing you’ve ever seen or heard in a stadium show before…
So a mixed review… it was certainly worth the dollars and a great experience… but I just can’t help but think of what it could have been if the tempo of the show had been better thought out, better suited to engage the technical capability of their stage… I’ll be the first to admit though, you’d be hard pressed to find other fans in attendance that would share my opinion most likely. For most, U2 could have done two hours of Monty Python’s “The Knights Who Say Ni”  and gone over just as well.
We should all aspire to be a little harder to please…
(Editor’s Note posting 10/22/09; As the 360 tour is pulling in to Pasadena, CA on October 25th… The LA Times has published this awesome interactive of the design process behind the development of “The Claw”, the current U2 stage. Thanks to Phil B. for the link!)
The pictures used in this post come from a set of 74 pictures that I’ve posted on Facebook… They were taken at the Sunday night show from Section 138 (Soldier Field, September 13, 2009). You can check those out by clicking here.

 
							






 
						 
						
Can’t argue much with any of the above.
I stopped buying U2 albums at Joshua Tree, so strongly agree with your playlist comments.
You made a great point about the stage structure compressing the vastness of the stadium. I think they deserve props for that- this was the most intimate audience of 65K I’ve ever been a part of. I mean- I was about 200 yards behind you, and didn’t feel like I was missing a thing… except Boy and October.
Stooge!! I do not know what show you went to, but this was an amazing experience. I understand you have to find something to write about that will drum up readers, but at least be accurate. My ticket was 55.00!! Maybe you should have purchased sooner?? Great set list (u2 fan here as well) Stop bitching. If you can only complain when you review, maybe you should pick a new career field because you obviously are a bitter individual with narrow thinking and understanding. I don’t think any of the 70,000 people with me in October hated what they went to. You are just pissy.
P.S. Don’t buy into this column. He also hates kittens, baby birds and Mother Theresa.
Thanks for the effort Paul… authoring incendiary commentary is obviously a strong hobby for you… clarifying a few things though…
1 > My writing here is fortunately not my “career field”… so, “drumming up readers” is not really any kind of concern to me.
2 > One thing I did do though, which you failed to do… was make a point… just sayin’…
3 > My latest review of Living Colour @ Double Door proves that it is possible to satisfy me… in fact, Living Colour blew the musical doors off of U2… and for quite a bit cheaper > http://optiflux.com/thescroll/?p=172
And last, I’m not really “bitching, bitter, pissy or of a narrow thinking and understanding”… although you got me on the last part… I do despise kittens, baby birds and especially Mother Theresa.
Cheers.
Boy am I happy I found this post! I just happened to stumble upon it thanks to a random U2 google search.
This was my first U2 show ever. I saw them when they came to Baltimore 2 months ago. Let me say that I totally agree with you on every single argument you make in this post. Being my first U2 show, you would think I would have been over the moon and not able to find anything to complain about, but being the true music-obsessed person that I am, I was a bit disappointed with this show; particularly the song selections.
The structure itself was epic. Utterly surreal. Had it not been for the stage, the show would have been a major, major letdown for me. I sat in the rear portion of the stadium (somewhat behind Larry) and at times, it felt like I had just paid a ticket for a backstage pass. Yes, the stage and screens were visible from a 360 angle, but the performances were not. For all of us in these sections, we felt totally neglected by the band, and for very few instances did they acknowledge that side of the stadium… Don’t call it a 360 tour if you are only going to play to one side of the place!
The setlist was something to be left desired. My high point was waiting for Bloody Sunday to come along. And just when it did, did we all jump out of our seats and belt out wholeheartedly along (at least I know I did, fist in the air and all). This amazing high was quickly killed by choosing to play Walk On after a song like this. Who does that?
U2 with such a vast catalogue of music have the luxury not many bands are able to say and do. They can choose meticulously what type of tempo they want their show to have. They can orchestra the waves of emotion and interaction to a perfect storm but they really dropped the ball on this one. It’s sad to see people that have paid so much for a ticket to just be sitting and waiting for the next song to come along because they just can’t skip that track like they normally would if they were listening to the cd.
Would I go see them again? Maybe. Was it something I regret? Not really. Will I remember it forever? Oh hell yeah! To be part of 80,000 people in one space and to see the magnitude of such a stage is something that will forever be surreal.